This is the original manuscript of Oscar Wilde’s De Profundis; a long, harrowing letter written to his lover Lord Alfred Douglas, whose dysfunctional relationship with his father Wilde blamed for his trial and imprisonment from 1895–97.
What does the title mean?
‘De Profundis’ is Latin for ‘from the depths’; it comes from the first line of Psalm 130 of the penitential Psalms: ‘Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O Lord’. The writer E. V. Lucas (1868–1938) claimed to have suggested the title; Wilde had suggested ‘Epistola: In Carcere et Vinculis’, meaning ‘Letter: In Prison and in Chains’.
How was it written?
During Wilde’s time in Reading Gaol, there was a change in prison leadership from Colonel Henry Isaacson (1842–1915) to Major James Nelson (1859–1914). Nelson allowed Wilde greater access to books and paper; Wilde would later call him ‘the most Christlike man I ever met’. Wilde could not bring himself to write a play in these conditions; instead he concentrated on the more typical prison genre of the letter, and worked on it between December 1896 and March 1897.
What sort of document is it?
To Wilde’s biographer Richard Ellmann, the ‘most important thing about De Profundis is that it is a love letter’; despite its occasional arrogance and understandable lapses in structure, ‘one of the greatest, and the longest, ever written’. It could be seen as a dramatic monologue from Wilde to Douglas – a long, public address in which Douglas’s responses are assumed.
As an autobiographical attempt to understand the nature of his own life and work, De Profundis also reflects brilliantly on art, love, forgiveness, the significance of Christ, and Wilde’s own character and failings. Sometimes it mimics the humility of Christ, others it returns to an older arrogance:
I was a man who stood in symbolic relations to the art and culture of my age. I had realised this for myself at the very dawn of my manhood, and had forced my age to realise it afterwards […]
Throughout, we see Wilde’s gift for a pithy, insightful statement, but sobered by suffering:
Most people live for love and admiration. But it is by love and admiration that we should live.
The critic Isobel Murray has argued that the letter shows the influence of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882), an American poet whose books had been on the first list Wilde had requested to read in prison.
How was it published?
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the text is often savagely critical of Alfred Douglas, and accordingly, Wilde’s executor Robert Ross (1869–1918) and others feared being sued for libel if they published it in its entirety.
The edition published in 1905 removed all reference to Douglas. In 1909, Ross gave this manuscript to the British Library (then the British Museum) on the condition that it was not made public for fifty years. In 1913, however, it was read in from as part of a libel case Douglas had brought against the writer Arthur Ransome (1884–1967), who had just published Oscar Wilde: a Critical Study.
After Douglas's death Wilde’s son Vyvyan Holland (1886–1967) published the full text of De Profundis (1949) from a transcript copy; but when Rupert Hart-Davis (1907–99) compared this version with the British Museum/British Library manuscript, he spotted inaccuracies and published a full version in 1962.
- Article by:
- Carolyn Burdett
- Fin de siècle
‘Art for art’s sake’? Aestheticism and decadence shocked the Victorian establishment by challenging traditional values, foregrounding sensuality and promoting artistic, sexual and political experimentation. Dr Carolyn Burdett explores the key features of this unconventional artistic period.
- Article by:
- John Stokes
- Fin de siècle
The Importance of Being Earnest draws on elements of farce and melodrama in its depiction of a particular social world. Professor John Stokes considers how Oscar Wilde combined disparate influences into a brilliant satire which contained hidden, progressive sentiments.