Does social and environmental reporting nurture trust and stakeholder engagement and reduce risk?

Does social and environmental reporting nurture trust and stakeholder engagement and reduce risk?
Document type
Working Paper
Author(s)
Solomon, Jill
Publisher
Cardiff Business School
Date of publication
1 December 2005
Series
Cardiff Working Papers in Accounting and Finance
Subject(s)
Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business, Management & leadership: including strategy, public sector management, operations and production
Collection
Business and management
Material type
Reports

Download (160KB )

Your use of this content is subject to the terms and conditions of this portal

A number of theoretical lenses have been used to explain voluntary social and environmental reporting (SER) including legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and political economy theory. Recent theoretical work in the SER area suggests that the risk society theory presents an appropriate alternative theoretical framework. According to the risk society theoretical framework, risks have evolved from manageable, identifiable, insurable risks into imperceivable, uninsurable, high consequence risks. Many high consequence risks relate directly to corporate behaviour in the social, ethical and environmental domain, such as global warming. The risk society framework is also characterised by a general decline in trust in institutions and organisations. This paper contributes to the SER literature by providing empirical evidence to support a risk society theory of voluntary SER. By engaging directly with 24 corporate social responsibility managers within UK listed companies, we show that risk is driving them to produce voluntary SER. The paper provides empirical evidence that SER is emerging as a mechanism for reducing risk and anxiety, through the nurturing of trust relationships between companies and their stakeholders. The interviews reveal that building and maintaining trust in shareholder and stakeholder relationships is a primary motivation for SER and that SER is a means of engaging in dialogue with the company’s stakeholders. Companies are, from a risk society perspective, implementing SER as a risk management mechanism. We also find from the interviews that voluntary SER is motivated far more by its link with financial performance, through reputation enhancement, than by a genuine desire to enhance social justice.

Is this theVersion of Record (VoR)’?
Many different versions of a publication may be available on the web, only some of which might be considered part of the formal scholarly record. Please check whether this paper has been published in a journal by contacting the author, searching journal databases, or checking CrossMark. It is the responsibility of publishers to register their publications with CrossMark.

Related to Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business

Follow the money: exploring the link between UK growth and workers' pay packets

Downloadable briefing note looking at the relationship between productivity and pay growth

From precarity to empowerment: women and the future of work

Downloadable paper on ensuring a fair future of work for women

Economic insecurity: the case for a 21st century safety net

Downloadable paper on how economic insecurity is experienced by workers

Taxation and supplier networks: evidence from India

Downloadable paper considering the effect of tax policy on supplier networks in a large developing economy

More items related to this subject