Affordable Rents compared to traditional social rents

Document type
Briefing
Corporate author(s)
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Publisher
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Date of publication
13 July 2018
Subject(s)
Social Policy, Housing and Homelessness, Poverty Alleviation Welfare Benefits and Financial Inclusion
Collection
Social welfare
Material type
Reports

Download (119KB )

This analysis looks at the difference between ‘Affordable Rent’ and traditional council and housing association rent levels (social rent).

Rent payments are the single biggest cost for many households. Access to low-cost social rented housing is a key issue in preventing low income families being swept into poverty.

The cost of renting in the social housing sector has steadily increased in recent years, as existing rents rose, and many new lettings are at higher market-linked ‘Affordable Rents’.

More from Social welfare collection

Related to Social Policy

Guidance on rents for social housing

This guidance sets out the Government’s policy on rents for social housing for April 2015 onwards. It applies to stock-owning local authorities only, though it is expected that the Social Housing Regulator

Making renting fit for families: the impact of different forms of rent regulation

A quarter of families now bring up their children in the private rented sector (PRS), but the sector is not fit for families. A crowded market and our renting laws make it fundamentally unstable, while

Housing costs and poverty: private rents compared to local earnings

Analysis of private sector rents across English districts

Pay to stay: fairer rents in social housing: consultation response

The government consulted on how income thresholds should work beyond the levels set out at Budget 2015, the interaction with Housing Benefit, and sought evidence of likely administrative costs in operating

More items related to this subject