How accurate are self-reported diagnosis: comparing self-reported health events in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing with adminstrative hospital records

Document type
Working Paper
Author(s)
Stoye, George; Zaranko, Ben
Publisher
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Date of publication
29 May 2020
Series
IFS Working Paper; W20/13
Subject(s)
Health Services
Collection
Social welfare
Material type
Reports

Download (342KB )

This paper uses linked survey responses and administrative hospital records to examine the accuracy of self-reported medical diagnoses. The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) collects self-reported information on the incidence of heart attacks, strokes and cancer in the past two years. This paper compares these reports with administrative hospital records to examine whether respondents are recorded as having an inpatient admission with these diagnoses during this period. It finds self-reported medical diagnoses are subject to considerable response error. More than half of respondents diagnosed in hospital with a condition in the previous two years fail to report the condition when surveyed. Furthermore, one half of those who self-report a cancer or heart attack diagnosis, and two-thirds of those who self-report a stroke diagnosis, have no corresponding hospital record. A major driver of this reporting error appears to be misunderstanding or being unaware of their diagnoses, with false negative reporting rates falling significantly for heart attacks and strokes when using only primary hospital diagnoses to define objective diagnoses. Reporting error is more common among men, older respondents and those with lower cognitive function. Estimates relying on these self-reported variables are therefore potentially subject to sizeable attenuation biases. These findings illustrate the importance of routine linkage between survey and administrative data.

 

More from Social welfare collection

Related to Health Services

Defining good in healthcare: independent health services: summary

In April 2013, CQC published its new strategy ‘Raising Standards, Putting People First’. In this document, CQC stated its intention to redevelop its inspection methodology and the information that is

Appendices to Provider handbook: consultation: community health services

This guidance describes CQC's approach to regulating, inspecting and rating community health services. It forms part of a public consultation CQC carried out on their approach to regulation and inspection

Migrant access to health services consultation

This briefing concerns the Home Office consultation on proposals to restrict access to free NHS services for some migrants. The Migrants' Rights Network considers that these proposals are unjustified,

Improving mental health services in immigration detention: an action plan

This is a joint action plan between the Department of Health, NHS England and Home Office on improving mental health services in immigration detention.It considers the provision of mental health

More items related to this subject