The implications of the National Funding Formula for schools.

Document type
Report
Author(s)
Perera, Natalie; Andrews, Jon; Sellen, Peter.
Publisher
CentreForum
Date of publication
17 March 2017
Subject(s)
Education and Skills, Children and Young People
Collection
Social welfare
Material type
Reports

Download (2.5MB )

This report states that the existing school funding system allocates money inconsistently across English schools, and that there is a strong case for introducing a new national funding formula despite public sector austerity measures. It describes detailed plans published in December 2016 by the Department for education relating to the construction of a national funding formula based on a combination of policy intentions and current practice. The authors explore the implications of these decisions on different areas, types of schools and pupils in England before considering the overall effect of the proposed formula alongside wider funding pressures forecast over the course of this spending period (up to 2019-20). They discuss the overall context of these measures and identify the following areas of concern:

  • the Department’s overall approach to funding for disadvantaged pupils seems to be inconsistent,  allocating almost one and a half times as much money to primary pupils than it does to secondary pupils, reflecting a policy decision to prioritise early intervention but proposing to allocate a greater weighting to disadvantaged secondary pupils compared to primary pupils; 
  • the proposed increase to low prior attainment funding (from £1.4bn to £2.4bn), combined with plans to use the Early Years Foundation Stage as a measure of whether a child is at risk of falling behind, heightens the current incentive for teachers to depress pupils results at the end of the Reception year in order to attract more funding to the school, and
  •  the Department is also proposing to spend £167m per year for schools that experience in year growth in pupil numbers and a further £23m on large volumes of pupils leaving or joining a school, but does not collect national data on these movements of pupils and thus proposes to spend the total of £190m based on how much local authorities currently allocate to certain schools.

They conclude that once inflation and other pressures are taken into account, all schools in England are likely to see real terms cuts in funding per pupil over the next 3 years, with many schools (around 5000) seeing further budget cuts after 2019-20 if the government fails to allocate more money to schools in the next spending review period and continues to converge schools towards the national funding formula.

Related to Education and Skills

Will universities need a bailout to survive the COVID-19 crisis

Briefing on the impact of the coronavirus on universities

The impact of undergraduate degrees on lifetime earnings

Report on the impact of undergraduate study upon earnings

Preschool quality and child development

Working paper on child development in Columbian preschools

2019 annual report on education spending in England

Report on education spending in England

More items related to this subject

Related to CentreForum

The performance of the NHS in England in transforming children's mental health services.

This report analyses data from NHS England’s new Mental Health Five Year Forward View Dashboard. The Dashboard, the second quarter of which was published in February 2017, is intended to act as a barometer

The introduction of Progress 8.

This report explains the workings of Progress 8, designed to measure how well pupils progress between the end of primary and the end of secondary school. The score for each pupil is based on whether

Annual London education report.

This report, the first yearly review of education in the city under Sadiq Khan, presents data relating to attainments in primary and secondary schools, initiatives to improve the prospects of disadvantaged

Schools plus: education at the heart of communities

Extended provision has a valuable role to play in education systems: the growing body of evidence from the UK is clear on this fact, as are the experts who contributed to this report. However, Governments’

More items related to this publisher