Management response to KPMG’s internal audit report Learning and Implications from University Hospitals Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust

Document type
Report
Corporate author(s)
Monitor (Agency : Great Britain)
Publisher
Monitor
Date of publication
26 June 2012
Subject(s)
Health Services
Corporate subject(s)
University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust
Collection
Social welfare
Material type
Reports

Download (323KB )

Having considered actions relevant to the lessons learned from Morecambe Bay that Monitor is taking already, KPMG made two recommendations to improve its assessment process further. The first is that Monitor should find a more systematic way of evaluating the cumulative impact of concerns that individually may not be significant but in combination may indicate the need to probe more deeply into a trust’s operations before concluding on authorisation. The second is that Monitor should obtain a letter of representation from the Boards of all applicant trusts confirming that the information they have provided to Monitor is complete and does not omit any potentially significant items.
Monitor agrees with these recommendations, and is already requiring deeper probes into governance arrangements for some applicants that are close to Monitor’s authorisation threshold

Related to Monitor

Review of the contingency planning team/trust special administration procedure at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust: lessons learned

Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust was the first organisation to go through the new regulatory enforcement procedure for NHS foundation trusts that was introduced under the Health and Social Care

Five year forward view: the Success Regime: a whole systems intervention

There are a number of challenged local health and care systems where the quality of care commissioned and provided to patients requires improvement; where services do not meet the expectations of the

Consultation on changes to the risk assessment framework: June 2015

The NHS faces a continuing and significant challenge to simultaneously improve quality, meet access targets and drive up productivity. Meeting this challenge means there can be no let-up in the pace

Improving GP services: commissioners and patient choice

This report presents the findings of Monitor's review of how GP services are working for patients, with a specific focus on the role of choice and competition. It focuses on the role of patient choice

More items related to this publisher