On the limits of rational choice theory

On the limits of rational choice theory
Document type
Working Paper
Author(s)
Hodgson, Geoffrey M
Publisher
University of Hertfordshire
Date of publication
21 May 2003
Series
The University of Hertfordshire Business School Working Papers
Subject(s)
People management: all aspects of managing people
Collection
Business and management
Material type
Reports

This item is only available to registered users

Register now or Log in

Your use of this content is subject to the terms and conditions of this portal

The value of rational choice theory for the social sciences has been long debated. Such rational choice theory involves a theory of behaviour based on the assumption that individuals are acting, or acting as if, to maximise their utility. The critique developed here focuses on the universality and unfalsifiability of the rational choice approach. In principle it can be adapted to fit any form of behaviour, including the behaviour of non-human organisms. Rational choice theory has the character of a universal explanation that can be made to fit any set of events. This is a sign of weakness rather than strength. Powerful explanations in the social sciences must focus on the particularities of the human and modern condition. A theory that brings in those particularities as a n afterthought will fail to capture their importance. It is shown that key concepts such as culture and learning fall into this category. The problem with rational choice theory is that, in its excessive quest for generality, it fails to focus on the historically and geographically specific features of the socio-economic systems. As long as social theory is confined to generalities it will remain highly limited in dealing with the specific world, including the one in which we live.

Is this the 'Version of Record (VoR)'?

Many different versions of a publication may be available on the web, only some of which might be considered part of the formal scholarly record. Please check whether this paper has been published in a journal by contacting the author, searching journal databases, or checking CrossMark It is the responsibility of publishers to register their publications with CrossMark.

Related to People management: all aspects of managing people

From rights to reality: enforcing labour market laws in the UK

Downloadable spotlight looking at violations of labour market rights

Good Work Plan: consultation on measures to address one-sided flexibility

Downloadable report on measures to address one-sided flexibility

Equality and discrimination: understand the basics

Downloadable guide outlining how to comply with equality legislation

More items related to this subject