A reconsideration of tax credit cuts: report, together with formal minutes relating to the report
- Document type
- Corporate author(s)
- Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Work and Pensions Committee
- Date of publication
- 11 November 2015
- House of Commons papers, session 2015/16; HC 548
- Poverty Alleviation Welfare Benefits and Financial Inclusion
- Social welfare
- Material type
Download (659KB )
The 2015 Summer Budget proposed draconian cuts to in-work tax credits in 2016-17. Even when combined with the welcome increase in the income tax personal allowance and the National Living Wage, these cuts of £4.4bn would cost the average affected family £1,100, a reduction in income that many cannot afford. There is now general agreement that it would be right for the Chancellor to rethink reforms that went too far and too fast and may have most impact on those in work and striving to succeed. The Chancellor has pledged to bring forward transitional measures in his Autumn Statement and there is widespread expectation that he may be willing to forgo some fiscal savings in the short term. This report considers the various mitigation options open to him.
Some facts about mitigation are very clear. Increases in the income tax personal allowance and the National Living Wage should not be confused with compensation for tax credit cuts. These welcome measures help a large share of the population, but that share excludes many of those subject to the cuts. The benefits to those who are helped are generally dwarfed by the cuts, especially in 2016-17. Acceleration of those changes, or alterations to national insurance, will not wash as solutions. The Chancellor should also resist the temptation to raid Universal Credit: this would either shift the burden to different low income families or undermine the objective of making work pay. The only efficient and effective immediate means of mitigating the tax credit cuts lie within the tax credit system.
There is, however, no magic bullet in the tax credit system. Something has to give: household incomes, work incentives or fiscal savings. The Committee recommends that, if these major changes cannot be satisfactorily mitigated now, it would be better to pause any major reforms until 2017-18. This would enable a necessary and ambitious debate about the future of working age benefits, and their position in a sustainable welfare system.
Related to TSO
BHS: First Report of the Work and Pensions Committee and Fourth Report of the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee of Session 2016-17. Report together with formal minutes relating to the report
BHS (British Home Stores), which was founded in 1928, was bought by Sir Philip Green in 2000. It became part of the Taveta group, which is ultimately controlled by Lady Green, in 2009. On 11 March 2015
The 2015 Summer Budget proposed draconian cuts to in-work tax credits in 2016-17. Even when combined with the welcome increase in the income tax personal allowance and the National Living Wage, these
The Education Committee and the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee agreed to carry out joint work on the contribution that education and skills make to productivity. In preparation for this work,
The Work Programme has streamlined the procurement of welfare-to-work, created a stable, GB-wide welfare-to-work infrastructure, and now produces a similar level of job outcomes for mainstream participants