Review of H G Wells's The Island of Dr. Moreau, from The Saturday Review


In this review of The Island of Dr. Moreau, P Chalmers Mitchell starts by praising H G Wells’s earlier work, but then complains that in this novel he ‘has put out his talent to the most flagitious usury’; in other works, he disapproves of it. He complains strongly about the amount of blood, the description of pain (‘unworthy of restrained art’), and the relentless horror of the story. It was acceptable at that time for reviewers to tell the story, and Moreau’s death is mentioned, and the boat with the corpses which drifts onto the island.

But mostly what annoys Mitchell is the science; although he agrees that ‘there is scientific basis enough to form the plot of a story’, he refutes Wells’s claim, made in an afternote, that ‘the manufacture of monsters – and perhaps even quasi-human monsters – is within the possibilities of vivisection’. Mitchell states that ‘you can transfuse blood or graft skin from one man to another; but attempts to combine living material from different animals fail’.

Full title:
'Mr Wells's "Dr. Moreau"'
11 April 1896, London
P Chalmers Mitchell, The Saturday Review
Usage terms
Public Domain
Held by
British Library
1855-1938 LON LD58 NPL

Related articles

An introduction to The Island of Dr. Moreau: science, sensation and degeneration

Article by:
Roger Luckhurst
Fin de siècle, Visions of the future

Roger Luckhurst looks at H G Wells’s The Island of Dr. Moreau as a text that both provoked and explored feelings of disgust, reflecting late-Victorian questions and fears about vivisection, cannibalism and evolutionary degeneration.

Related collection items

Related works

The Island of Dr. Moreau

Created by: H G Wells

A scientific romance by H G Wells (1866-1946), published in 1896. In 1895, Wells had written a paper on ‘The ...