Top to bottom: understanding fairer pay

Top to bottom: understanding fairer pay
Document type
Report
Corporate author(s)
High Pay Centre
Publisher
High Pay Centre
Date of publication
4 March 2013
Subject(s)
Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business, Management & leadership: including strategy, public sector management, operations and production
Collection
Business and management
Material type
Reports

Download (508KB )

Your use of this content is subject to the terms and conditions of this portal

This report highlights that even a modest level of wealth redistribution could make a substantial difference to the standard of living for low-earners, and would not be greatly missed by those at the top. For example, 10% redistributed from those earning £150k+ (about 0.9% of the population) to the bottom 25% would equate to an average 55p per hour pay rise.

Other key findings of the report include:

  • The share of national income going to the top 1% of the income distribution has more than doubled since 1979 to 14.5% from 6%.
  • There are 29,000 people in the UK (the top 0.11% of the income scale) who earn more than £500,000 a year. They already take home £21,500 a month after tax. That is more in a month than someone on an average salary earns in a year (£20,500, after tax). And the government is about to give a tax break worth up to £2.7 billion to the top 1%when the 50p rate is abolished in April, so take home pay for the rich will become even more disproportionate.
  • There are 6.75 million people (the bottom 25% of earners) who take home less than £800 a month. Five million of these are full-time employees.
  • Wages for most of the population have stagnated, barely keeping up with inflation.
  • If those earning more than £150,000 took a 10% pay cut and it went directly to the bottom 25%, they would get a 55 per hour pay rise to £7.35, taking them closer to the national living wage of £7.45.
  • If those earning over £300,000 (the top 0.25%) gave up 10 per cent of their pay, the lowest paid 25% would get a rise of £40 a month.
  • These changes would not be fiscally neutral, but would inject some spending power into the economy at the bottom, where it is needed.

Related to Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business

Building a world-class innovation and digital economy: recommendations for an innovation and technology-led recovery

Downloadable report on an innovation and technology-led recovery after Covid-19

Preparing for the next normal: build modified resilient operations

Downloadable article on building resilient operations during the COVID-19 recovery phase

Funding our future: enabling financial services to deliver prosperity across the UK

Downloadable report on the UK regulatory and taxation systems

A roaring trade: capitalising on the opportunities of a UK-US Free Trade Agreement

Downloadable report on the business opportunities of the UK-US trade deal

More items related to this subject