Trust formation processes in innovative collaborations

Trust formation processes in innovative collaborations
Document type
Article
Author(s)
Hardwick, Jialin; Anderson, Alistair R; Cruickshank, Douglas
Publisher
Emerald
Date of publication
1 January 2013
Series
European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 16; Number 1
Subject(s)
Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business, Management & leadership: including strategy, public sector management, operations and production
Collection
Business and management
Material type
Reports

This item is only available to registered users

Register now or Log in

Your use of this content is subject to the terms and conditions of this portal

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the practices and processes of trust building and use in collaborative networking for product innovation and to compare face to face with virtual networking. Design/methodology/approach - Guided by a literature review and preliminary participant observation, 16 open ended interviews collected data about the processes in 11 small biotech firms. These data were inductively analysed by the constant comparative method to develop explanatory themes. Findings - Trust was seen as a requirement for successful collaborative innovation, but the paper identified how different dimensions of trust are located in the trust building processes. Trust works by creating a platform of confidence that fosters flows of information and the exchange of tacit knowledge. Two types of trust relationships, the technical and the social, work in different ways to produce different, but complementary, types of trust. Virtual environments suit technical trust building but are less suited to developing deeper, more enduring forms of trust. Research limitations/implications - These different approaches to collaboration are often implicit. But if practitioners are made aware of how they work, they can use the most appropriate approach to build trust. Practical implications - The method and sample restrict general application, but the explanatory framework may be conceptually generalisable. Social implications - Networking for innovation is seen as much social as technical. Originality/value - The paper contributes conceptually by theorising the trust building process and its role in knowledge sharing and collaborative innovation. It addresses a gap in the literature in identifying how trust is produced, developed and employed in furthering innovation, in particular the behavioural patterns of using virtual networks in furthering innovation.

Related to Trends: economic, social and technology trends affecting business

Follow the money: exploring the link between UK growth and workers' pay packets

Downloadable briefing note looking at the relationship between productivity and pay growth

From precarity to empowerment: women and the future of work

Downloadable paper on ensuring a fair future of work for women

Economic insecurity: the case for a 21st century safety net

Downloadable paper on how economic insecurity is experienced by workers

Mapping millennials' living standards

Downloadable briefing note on UK millennials, including pay and employment

More items related to this subject

Related to Emerald

Specialized entrepreneurship education: does it really matter? Fresh evidence from Pakistan

Downloadable article on the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education

Willingness to pay for innovations:

This article is about consumer value and the related consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for innovations.The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of national culture and globalization

Transformational leadership in leading young innovators: a subordinate's perspective

This paper is about leadership styles. In particular, it investigates what kind of leadership young innovators favour.Leadership preferences are studied in the context of transformational leadership

Business model configurations: a five-V framework to map out potential innovation routes

This article is about business model (BM) innovation. It starts from the premise that managers - according to the authors - still lack appropriate frameworks and tools to support them in updating their

More items related to this publisher