The Petition of Right

Description

From shortly after his accession, King Charles I (r. 1625–49) found himself in a series of confrontations with his Parliaments, notably over the management of his war with Spain. In 1626, having failed to receive a grant of taxation for the war, Charles resorted to a forced loan, effectively a tax which had not been authorised by Parliament. This forced loan met substantial resistance, with some prominent gentlemen being imprisoned for their refusal to comply. When five of those men (the Five Knights) tried to secure their freedom by issuing a writ of habeas corpus, the Crown argued that it had the power to commit people to prison at its own discretion, without stating a specific, legal reason. 

By 1628 Charles had no option but to turn again to Parliament. When it met, the House of Commons expressed its determination to secure a strong commitment from the King to observe the rule of law, since the Crown was held to have breached the spirit of clause 39 of Magna Carta. The Commons asserted their interpretation of the law by presenting Charles with a ‘Petition of Right’, rather than a formal bill, implying that they were claiming the subject’s existing rights, rather than creating new ones. The idea of the Petition of Right was suggested by Edward Coke, and it made explicit reference to the imprisonment of the Five Knights being contrary to ‘The Great Charter of the Liberties of England’. Once it had the reluctant assent of Charles – endorsed in his hand ‘soit droit fait comme est desiré’ – the Petition was regarded as having the same status as an Act of Parliament, and was therefore as strong a guarantee of the subject’s rights as Magna Carta itself.

Full title:
The Petition of Right
Published:
House of Commons, Parliament, Westminster, London
Created:
1628
Format:
Manuscript
Usage terms

© Parliamentary Archives, London HL/PO/PU/1/1627/3c1n2

Held by
Parliamentary Archives
Shelfmark:
HL/PO/PU/1/1627/3c1n2

Related articles

Britain's unwritten constitution

Article by:
Robert Blackburn
Theme:
Magna Carta today

Unlike most modern states, Britain does not have a codified constitution but an unwritten one formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments and conventions. Professor Robert Blackburn explains this system, including Magna Carta’s place within it, and asks whether the UK should now have a written constitution.

Magna Carta and jury trial

Article by:
Geoffrey Robertson
Theme:
Magna Carta today

Geoffrey Robertson QC charts the history of jury trials and their relationship to Magna Carta. From medieval justice to the trial of Charles I, and the trials of John Lilburne to the Human Rights Act, discover the evolution of one of the most venerated features of Anglo-American law.

The turbulent 17th century: Civil War, regicide, the Restoration and the Glorious Revolution

Article by:
Matthew White
Theme:
Politics and religion

The 17th century was a time of great political and social turmoil in England, marked by civil war and regicide. Matthew White introduces the key events of this period, from the coronation of Charles I to the Glorious Revolution more than 60 years later.

Related collection items